|

|
Don’t
Overlook Important Provisions
in Cross-Border Contracts
By Jon P. Yormick, Managing Attorney,
Yormick &
Associates |
|
|
|
For U.S. companies seeking business partners in
Canada, a well-written agreement should be mandatory. Of
course, any agreement should have clearly written terms to avoid
disputes over rights and obligations and the threat of costly and
protracted litigation. Cross-border agreements, such as those
for a commercial agent, distributorship, or a supply contract,
require more than “boilerplate” language; yet many companies on both
sides of the border rely upon such provisions. Doing so may
overlook key provisions of the agreement and lead to uncertainty,
increase business disruption and increase costs should a dispute
arise. This paper will briefly discuss 2 important aspects of
a cross-border agreement that U.S. and Canadian companies can
consider. |
|
|
|
|
The UN Convention on the Sale of
International Goods (CISG)
In a domestic agreement for the sale of goods between U.S. or Canadian-only
parties, domestic law (state, provincial, federal) will apply to construe
contract provisions and resolve disputes. In a cross-border agreement,
however, companies should know about and be familiar with the United Nations
Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980).
The CISG has been adopted by the U.S., Canada (since 1992 in Ontario), and
approximately 60 other countries. Because it is an international
treaty, it is the “law of the land.” The CISG does not preempt
provisions in a private contract between parties; instead, it provides a
legal framework for interpreting the contract, fills any gaps in contract
language, and governs issues not addressed by the contract.
In cross-border disputes, U.S. courts have consistently determined that a
simple choice of law provision in a contract does not allow the parties to
“opt-out” of the CISG. If the parties intend to do so, they must use
language that expressly excludes the CISG. Companies should also be
aware that using purchase orders, confirmations, emails and other “less
formal” transaction documents that can form a contract for the cross-border
sale of goods will be governed by the CISG unless there is express language
excluding it.
This means parties should not expect laws such as the Uniform Commercial
Code (UCC) or the Ontario Sale of Goods Act to apply if a choice of law
provision states only that “the law of the State of New York shall apply” or
“this agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario.”
U.S. and Canadian companies and unknowing legal counsel may be in for a
surprise if a dispute arises over matters such as product warranty, delivery
date, or rejection of defective products. Of course, parties should
also understand the differences between the CISG and domestic law before
making an informed decision on whether to “opt-out” or not.
Avoiding Litigation in Favor of International Arbitration
Whether the CISG will apply to your cross-border sale or not, disputes can
(and often do) arise in business. International arbitration is highly
favored to resolve cross-border disputes. A cross-border agreement
should always contain a clearly written arbitration provision. The
parties to the agreement are encouraged to address this issue early in
negotiations and not to hastily insert this provision. While it might
not be viewed as a “deal-breaking” provision, it can help to avoid
significant costs and even preserve a commercial relationship between the
parties.
Some advantages of international arbitration include: recognition of the
award under the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of
Foreign Arbitral Awards; avoiding protracted and costly litigation (and
appeals), particularly in the U.S. where the rules of discovery tend to
prolong litigation; the ability of parties to control the dispute resolution
process; the involvement of arbitrators experienced in international dispute
resolution; and the private, confidential nature of the proceedings.
When negotiating and drafting an arbitration provision, the parties should
be mindful of a number of important aspects of it. Depending on the
parties, the subject matter and even the value of the contract involved, the
arbitration provision can be brief or quite comprehensive. Parties
should always remember that this is their opportunity to control the dispute
resolution process and take the time to consider and address these issues.
When negotiating and drafting the arbitration provision, the parties should
consider and determine matters such as: whether negotiations or mediation
will be required before commencing arbitration proceedings; what the scope
of the arbitration will be; the applicable law; the location and language to
be used in the proceedings; whether the arbitrator(s) will have certain
qualifications or special knowledge; whether an administering body will be
used; what arbitration rules will apply (UNCITRAL or arbitral body’s rules);
whether the arbitrator(s) will have authority to grant interim relief;
whether the parties must continue to perform their obligations regardless of
an on-going dispute or claim; and what, if any, pre-hearing discovery will
be permitted.
For more information about international arbitration, you may want visit
websites of well-respected arbitral institutions such as the International
Centre for Dispute Resolution (www.icdr.org)
or the British Columbia International Commercial Arbitration Centre (www.bcicac.com).
Conclusion
Doing business internationally offers a wealth of
potential for U.S. and Canadian companies. Like any matter, being
prepared by knowing the rules in advance, how to avoid or reduce risk, and
how to efficiently resolve disputes that arise should not be overlooked by
companies on either side of the border.
|